![]() |
Volume 135 12-18-02 @ 12:11 PM(cst) |
Plus -- The Conservative Quote of the Day
Lott episode could help country move onJim Leahy |
Looking at the papers and the nightly news shows, you would think that the Trent Lott had actually said that segregation was great and should be re-instituted. What he said was stupid on the face of it. Lott is a Republican, saying any Democrat should have been President over any Republican shows he was not thinking about what he said. Why then is such a big deal being made of this? The Democrats need an issue, and he gave them one. I am not saying that bringing people together isn't important. I am saying that nothing the GOP can do will ever quite the critics who brought this issue forward. It was a week after Thurmond's birthday party that this was brought up, by Jesse Jackson then Al Sharpton jumped in. Tom Daschel at first brushed off the comments saying that he and Lott are always in front of a microphone and sometimes talk without thinking. He then did an about-face after being taken to the woodshed by Maxeen Waters, when she reminded him who really was in charge of the Democrat party. Talk about racial reconciliation, Jackson, Sharpton, and Waters have done more to separate people because of race than any segregationist could ever hope to do. President Bush has gone out of his way to reach out to the black community in the past few years. During the elections of 2000 he announced that Colin Powell and Condi Rice would be his foreign policy team, making them the highest ranking African Americans in any administration, ever. Did that stop the NAACP from connecting him to the dragging murder of an African American? No. Will getting rid of Lott stop future lies and charges of racism coming from the Democrat party? No. Will it stop them from claiming that the GOP is going to starve old people and children? No. Or poison people for money from big corporations? No. It is time to stop this! Has anyone thought that the Republican Senators who have come together to say they supported Lott, have done so because they know him and know he is not a racist? If Lott is tossed aside because of something he did not say, but is implied he meant, who's next? After all he did not say the word segregation, he did not say the word race, he didn't even say Democrat (which Thurmond was). Now they can put words into someone's mouth and then call for their heads? Talk about scary. And Republicans think it will end with Lott? I have heard some conservatives say that Lott has not been a good leader, he has compromised too many times on the conservative agenda (the National Review has used this as an excuse to call for his head). If the GOP forces Lott's resignation we will pay the price. We will have empowered Jackson, Sharpton and Waters to continue separating people. If Lott should be replaced it should be in two years, and not for being a racist, but because he has lost the confidence of GOP Senators. Some conservatives want Lott to pay for not being tuff enough on the impeachment of Clinton. How will caving now make up for his caving then? |
Pro-lifers triumphed in electionTHOMAS ROESER |
| These are the times that try men's souls in Illinois--especially if the souls are Republican and pro-life. But that's far from true in the nation. So before we get back to the dismal status of Illinois, let's look at the record in the nation for support of the unborn. For the first time since Roe vs. Wade (1973) but for a brief period in 2001, we now have a pro-life president and pro-life leadership in both houses of Congress. That's really amazing when you consider the media's frequent misassessment that the issue is a losing one for the GOP. All but one, possibly two, incoming 33 Republican House members are pro-life. Florida's Katherine Harris, who braved the recount tirade by Democrats, replaces a liberal Republican pro-choicer, Rep. Marge Roukema. Add to this the fact that three of the scarce new Democrats are pro-life and the tally looks very encouraging. The Republican National Coalition for Life hails 16 wins among 20 endorsed congressional candidates, 10 of them new members. You've heard of Emily's List, which pushes women pro-choice candidates for Congress? It usually trumpets its victories. Not this time. Emily lost 17 of 22 races. The National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League backed 19 favorites, losing 18. Its rival, the Susan B. Anthony List, which backs pro-lifers, won 22 of its 30 contests. The pro-life team walloped 'em and results should take place in the new session. First on the agenda is passage of the Partial Birth Abortion Ban to prohibit the killing of a partially born child. The legislation actually was passed twice before, only to be vetoed by President Clinton. This time, incoming Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott has announced, ''I will call it up, we will pass it and the president will sign it. You can write that down.'' I just did. Other legislation may well include the Abortion Non-Discrimination Act, to protect the conscience rights of health care workers in institutions that participate in abortion, and the Child Custody Protection Act, making it a crime for a non-parent adult to take a child across state lines for an abortion. In contrast to the national scene, the situation in Illinois is grim. Not only do we have a pro-abortion rights Democratic slate plus a single pro-abortion rights Republican, Judy Baar Topinka, believe it or not, some Republican leaders are openly gunning for Sen. Peter Fitzgerald, a courageous pro-life senator. They include--stunningly--House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert and Rep. Ray LaHood, who are seeking a primary opponent for Fitzgerald. Hastert and LaHood are pro-life, but are unconcerned with the consequences. The reason is Fitzgerald displeased elements of the business community and organized labor for his stand against O'Hare expansion. While Fitzgerald will probably win over any primary challenger, the LaHood-Hastert effort would undoubtedly weaken him so that he could be carved up by either former Sen. Carol Moseley-Braun, former Chicago School Board President Gery Chico, state Comptroller Dan Hynes or Blair Hull, a mega-millionaire. All are fervent abortion-rights supporters. Possibly the real reason for his fellow GOPers' ire is that Fitzgerald has nominated federal prosecutors who are not susceptible to political persuasion. All of us remember the dust-up that followed from Hastert's office when the senator spoke out eloquently against using the Springfield Lincoln Museum as a patronage dump, and when the senator insisted on his right to send to the White House the names of U.S. attorneys who are not involved in Illinois' peculiar brand of Republi-crat dickering. The first test of reputedly pragmatic Topinka as state Republican chairman should be to call off the dogs that are baying for Fitzgerald's defeat. |
GOP INFOCompiled by Jim Leahy |
Celebrating Great Leadership" - A Salute to President George W. Bush ***************************************
WASHINGTON, DC...The federal government will grant Illinois more than $5 million to help emergency management and state and local responders effectively respond to acts of terrorism and other emergencies, U.S. Senator Peter G. Fitzgerald (R-IL) announced today. "This funding will play a vital role in strengthening the ability of communities across Illinois to effectively respond to emergencies, especially potential acts of terrorism," said Fitzgerald. "It will also equip our first responders in emergencies with the resources they need to protect our communities." According to Fitzgerald, nearly $4.5 million will be used to update state and local plans and procedures for responding to all hazards, with particular focus on emergencies involving weapons of mass destruction. The majority of remaining funds will be used to train individuals in emergency response skills.
************************************** Fitzgerald is lead Republican sponsor of successful legislation to extend unemployment benefits WASHINGTON, DC ...Senator Peter G. Fitzgerald (R-Illinois) is the lead Republican sponsor of legislation to extend unemployment benefits until April 1, 2003, legislation which passed the U.S. Senate late last night. The bill will also extend the existing TANF program (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families) program through March 31, 2003.
The legislation, co-authored by Senators Cantwell, Hillary Clinton (D-New York), and Arlen Specter (R-Pennsylvania), extends unemployment benefits set to expire on December 28, 2002 for an additional three months. Under the Senate bill, even people who enroll just prior to the expiration of the unemployment insurance benefits will be eligible for the full 13 weeks of unemployment benefits. The bill is expected to directly benefit 93,800 Illinois workers. From December 28 through the end of March, 2003 it is anticipated that more than 52,000 Illinois workers have exhausted their 26 weeks of regular state unemployment benefits. After using up their state benefits, these workers then became eligible for federally funded benefits, called Temporary Emergency Unemployment Compensation (TEUC), which last for up to 13 additional weeks. Almost 42,000 Illinois workers will have used up their TEUC by the end of December. The number of Illinoisans who have used up their benefits has more than doubled over the past two years.
Last night, the U.S. House also passed an unemployment extension bill. The House version would extend benefits to workers for only an additional five weeks. At today’s press conference, Senator Fitzgerald said he will call House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-Illinois) to urge him to pass the Senate bill before the chamber adjourns. ****************************************** Do you think Gore saw these numbers?
|
Conservative Quote of the Day |
| "Communist regimes were not some unfortunate aberration, some historical deviation from a socialist ideal. They were the ultimate expression, unconstrained by democratic and electoral pressures, of what socialism is all about.... In short, the state [is] everything and the individual nothing." ==>– Margaret Thatcher |

Copyright 2000
NDR Information Services
Chicago, Illinois
All Rights Reserved