![]() |
Volume 118 08-03-02 @ 4:12 PM(cst) |
Plus -- The Conservative Quote of the Day
Bio of IL GOP Chairman Gary MacDougalIllinois GOP |
| For everyone who has been on vacation or having summer fun with your families a big change has occurred in the Illinois Republican Party. We have a new Chairman, his name is Gary MacDougal. Here is his Bio taken from the Illinois GOP web site Mr. MacDougal became Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Mark Controls Corporation in September 1969 when he and a group of venture capital investors assumed control of the company. Mark Controls has been a leading manufacturer and installer of building management systems and services, and a manufacturer of flow control equipment for the petroleum, process and power industries. |
Time to get involvedJim Leahy |
| Why does it matter who the chairman of the party is? Why is Mr. MacDougal any different from any of the previous chairman of the last 23 years? Because Mr. MacDougal is a conservative!! Four years ago when I was offered the executive directorship of the Republican Assembly of Illinois, our goal was to move the Republican party in Illinois to reflect the national platform. We thought that it would take at least a decade maybe more. We were wrong. The Future is now! Some will say that MacDougal was not the first choice, Jim Ryan can't be given credit. No matter how he got around to appointing Mr. MacDougal Jim Ryan has now given a voice to the base of our party. It is only appropriate that we acknowledge the steps Jim Ryan has taken not only by wholeheartedly supporting his candidacy, but by working in support of the whole Republican ticket. We should not look to purge the moderates from our party, we do not want retribution for past slights, it is time to move forward. We learned from Jim Jeffords that it takes every Republican vote we can get to achieve our goals. We can not let this opportunity slip away from us. The people who have been pushed from power have already began to plant stories in the papers saying if Republicans lose in November they will take the party back. You can see that the blame for the loss will be put on conservatives and our leaders. Some would say the election is over. Others hope we believe it. It would be scary if this were a regular election year but it's not. We have the good luck to have all of the candidates for the constitutional offices on the Democratic ticket from the Cook County Democratic party. As a matter of fact the whole ticket is from the same area of Chicago. All of the constitutional candidates on the Democratic side are from an area only seven miles around. The most liberal part of the most liberal county in the state, if not the country. We have already seen the reports in the papers that the State income tax will be raised if the Democrats win (News Sun- "State Senator Link- State tax hike inevitable"). We have also seen that Rod Blagojevich will overturn the education reforms that Mayor Daley has bragged about ("Blagojevich way out in front" Sun Times 2-2-02) Is it because of the $345,000 from the Illinois Federation of Teachers and $554,461 from the Service Employees International Union and its locals--all supporters of rewriting state legislation to allow Chicago public school teachers to potentially strike, over non economic issues, such as class size. Blagojevich came out firmly in support of such a change, saying "it makes perfect sense to be able to do that".
|
Score 2 for pro-life forcesTHOMAS ROESER |
| Two significant pro-life achievements were attained recently: one was front-page news, the other hardly noticed. Let's take the hardly noticed measure first. A Chicago area nurse won a national victory in her battle against live-birth abortion last week when the U.S. Senate, without dissent or debate, passed the Born Alive Infants Protection Act and sent the measure on to President Bush for his signature. Jill Stanek, a nurse from suburban Mokena, brought the issue to Congress two years ago with the stunningly disturbing news that babies surviving abortions at Christ Hospital in Oak Lawn were left to die without medical care. Stanek lost her job as labor/delivery nurse at the hospital because of her protests. Stanek had herself held one of the surviving infants--a 21-gestational-week boy--for about 45 minutes while he struggled for breath and died. The bill passed on the unanimous consent calendar through the leadership of Sen. Rick Santorum (R-Pa.) but with the concurrence of Sen. Tom Daschle (D-S.D.), the Senate majority leader. Modest though the bill is, the measure is historic because, according to Dr. Hadley Arkes, the Amhurst college professor who wrote the text of the bill for the House Judiciary's Constitution subcommittee, ''it would confirm that Congress can lay hands on this subject [abortion], that Congress may legislate to establish the limits to the right of abortion and even bar certain kinds of abortion.'' Stanek has been out of work as a nurse through her intense battle to persuade Advocate Health Care to stop inducing premature births as a method of abortion. The measure defines as legal persons infants born alive during abortions regardless of the condition of the babies or circumstances of their birth. Stanek ran for a state House seat in March but lost. This victory, which has national significance, more than makes up for her defeat. An auxiliary victory of sorts was scored with the Associated Press coverage of the live birth abortion issue when the measure passed the House. The news service reported that the measure affected a live ''fetus.'' Live fetus? That's a baby, isn't it? By that yardstick, are we not all grown-up fetuses? What's wrong with the use of the word ''baby'' or ''infant''? Well, baby and infant are words that evidently make the issue too graphic. But after protests, this time the AP shifted its ground somewhat, but is still reluctant to use the word baby or infant. ''The Senate sent to the White House . . . a bill that ensures that a live birth--even if it occurs during abortion--has certain rights under federal law,'' the AP said. Live birth of what? A baby, obviously. The second pro-life victory was scored by the Bush administration. It cuts off $34 million earmarked for UN ''family planning'' programs overseas. In doing so, Bush has rebuffed Secretary of State Colin Powell. An independent study, led by the prestigious Population Research Institute, scored China's forced abortion policy, which would have benefitted from the funding. The private group contradicted a report by a State Department panel that whitewashed China's depopulation actions. Some lawmakers intend to fight the Bush decision. If so, they should take into account a Cybercast News Service (CNSNews.com) story by Patrick Goodenough. It says that Chinese women married to Taiwanese men ''are being ordered to have abortions or sterilization surgery during visits to the mainland to comply with China's controversial 'one child' policy. At least six of these women report that [Beijing's] family planning officials forced them to undergo pregnancy tests in recent months. About 100,000 Taiwanese are believed to be married to spouses from the mainland. Social conservatives chafing at not winning all their battles with the Bush administration should consider the population fund cut-off and the live-birth abortion measure that the president will sign as vital. Now their job is to push Congress to pass the partial-birth abortion ban. It passed the House Judiciary Committee last week by a vote of 20-8. The goal is for speedy House passage (it has passed the measure before) and on to the Senate before its August recess. When pro-lifers grumble at Bush, they should recall that Bill Clinton vetoed a partial-birth abortion ban twice--in 1996 and 1997. This time, President Bush would enthusiastically sign it. |
Conservative Quote of the Day |
| "The policy of the American government is to leave their citizens free, neither restraining nor aiding them in their pursuits." ==>– Thomas Jefferson |

Copyright 2000
NDR Information Services
Chicago, Illinois
All Rights Reserved